"the Fuhrer had fallen at his command post in the Reich Chancery fighting to the last breath against Bolshevism and for Germany".
.
.
.
In remarks apparently directed at Israel, Field Marshal Muhammad Hussein Tantawi, the head of Egypt’s Supreme Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) and the country’s de facto leader, threatened on Monday to thwart any foreign aggression against Egypt. He was speaking in the wake of reports, widely covered in the Egyptian media, that Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has warned of an imminent military threat emanating from Egypt. “Our borders are constantly burning, but we do not attack any neighboring country but only protect our borders,” Tantawi told Egyptian press during a live ammunition maneuver in the Sinai Peninsula titled “Nasr 7.” “If anyone comes close to Egypt’s border, we will break their leg. Therefore, our forces must be in a perpetual state of alert.”
A second senior military figure, Major General Muhammad Higazi, commander of Egypt’s Second Field Army, also issued a tacit threat, warning that potential aggressors should “reconsider before thinking of attacking any part of Egypt’s territory.”
In Jerusalem, the Foreign Ministry sought to calm the dispute. “The foreign minister was interviewed today on two Israeli radio stations,” a spokesman said on Monday evening, “and he made it very clear that both sides have a clear interest in keeping the peace agreement.”
On Sunday, the Hebrew daily Maariv reported that Lieberman recently sent a letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, warning him about a potential threat from Egypt and requesting that Israel’s southern command be reinforced by three military divisions. “The Egyptian issue is much more disturbing than the Iranian problem,” Lieberman was reported to have said during closed discussions on the topic.
Lieberman’s comments were prominently covered in Egyptian media on Monday, sparking condemnation from commentators and politicians.
Egypt’s Foreign Ministry asked the Israeli government on Monday to clarify the statements attributed to Lieberman.
Foreign Minister Muhammad Amr asked his ambassador in Tel Aviv to inquire about statements comparing the Egyptian threat to that of Iran, establishment daily Al-Ahram reported Monday.
“[The Egyptian ambassador] will convey Egypt’s bewilderment at the publication of such words, attributed to a senior official in the Israeli government,” read a statement issued by Egypt’s Foreign Ministry.
According to Maariv, Lieberman also criticized the fighting capabilities of the seven battalions Egypt sent to the Sinai recently to combat al-Qaeda operatives in the peninsula. The minister could not rule out the possibility that Egypt will divert more substantial military forces to the Sinai following the election of a new president in June, in violation of the 1979 peace treaty with Israel, Maariv reported.
“The Egyptian fighter will secure the eastern borders of the country,” said Major General Muhammad Higazi, commander of Egypt’s Second Field Army, during the Sinai maneuver. “The ongoing training is a clear message for all to reconsider before thinking of attacking any part of Egypt’s territory,” he told Al-Ahram.
The daily quoted Higazi as saying that Egypt’s armed forces sent troops to the northern Sinai city of Al-Arish, near the border with the Gaza Strip, “without asking permission from anyone.”
“We act based on what influences us, not according to what the other side [Israel] imposes on us,” Higazi added.
. . | |
This book was written in the shadow of the air of distress and despair which is spreading throughout Israel, a country which many of its residents think is progressively deteriorating. The book was written in 1984 and is even more relevant today, in 2012. Identifying the spreading distress and despair is important forunderstanding the proper ways to heal and repair it. Israel is now in an extremely abnormal and difficult situation --Israeli governments have refused to recognize the existence of an Israeli nation and so cannot see the existence of the state as an instrument of political initiative and as a tool in the service of the nation and citizens who residewithin its borders. The lack of normality in Israel stems from ignoring the national interest of Israelis. Israel sees itself not as the land of theIsraeli nation, but as the land of the Jews scattered throughout many other countries. Therefore Israeli has no prime mission of concern for the welfare of the Israeli nation (which it does not recognize); it is concerned for the welfare of the Jewish diaspora, a situation which is impossible because these people live in the diaspora as citizens of other countries. Since the declaration of Israel's independence, the progression of changes which was seen as natural and accepted throughout Jewish history was utterly distorted and chaos ensued. At first the traditional Jewish nation was a collection of scattered communities unified by a religion, a culture, and an ethnicity. This changed with the rise of modern nationalism, which began in modern Europe and America, because the modern nations assimilated the Jews as their own sons and daughters. An exception was Eastern Europe, where Jews were not permitted to join the local nationalist movements and instead formed a Jewish nationalist movement which aimed at creating a new Jewish nation with an independent state within geographical boundaries; these movements became the Zionist movement. When this aspiration was fulfilled, as happened to other nations, there should have been an announcement of the new Israeli nation and the revocation of the Jewish nation. (Revocation of the nation but not of the religion, culture, and ethnic identity.) The advantage to this would have been that the existence of an Israeli nation would support and strengthen the existence of Jews of other nationalities, as Herzl envisioned it. It would have added a new dimension: Jewish political policy (without the revocation of the traditional elements of religion, culture, and Jewish ethnicity.) Had the leaders of Israel truly aspired to fulfill these hopes and found a normal state, they should have announced the start of a new Israeli nation as heir to the movement's political hopes and as its embodiment; they did not do so. The leaders of Israel do not recognize the changes and exchanges which have taken place in the modern world -- the development of liberal democratic nation-states which are concerned with the welfare of its citizens -- and remain with the viewpoint of the pre-national world. They treat it as one largeJewish ghetto, and maintain an army to keep the Jewish community concentrated within it. The Jewish nation remains scattered throughout the nations but isunited, be it by a shared religion, shared culture, or shared ethnicity. It lacks nationality in the modern sense. In the modern world its sons and daughters belong to various nations. Some of its children have an additional plot of land guarded by a Jewish army, but without its own nationality. This is Israel's single innovation -- a ghetto for members of the Jewish religion,guarded by a Jewish army. As a state of a religion-nation, Israel recognizes only the Orthodox stream of Judaism while adopting the fiction of religious equality which allows it to ignore its children who are organized into communities which are not Orthodox, much less its children which are not Jewish at all. The only solution which could save Israel from the chaos in which it languishes is to draw a distinction between members of the Israeli nation and members of the Jewish religion and to separate government of the nation from that of the community, separate religious institutions from the state. Thus Israel can try to fulfill the dreams of thefathers of emancipation: renewal and revival of an ancient race returning to its soil. Israel must recognize the Israeli nation and an Israeli national identity whose purpose it is to establish a government which will be concerned for the welfare of the nation and the benefit of its children while revoking the mystical messianic goals in whose name the governments of Israel have professed to preserve the members of the Jewish religion, culture, and ethnicity throughout the world. |